Malaysia Airlines apologises for ‘offensive’ tweet

“Want to go somewhere but don’t know where?” read the post on Twitter that was meant to promote special deals by the national carrier, prompting scorn from online users.


“I genuinely feel sorry for @MAS, an airline I like, but seriously: ‘Want to go somewhere but don’t know where?'” one user posted.

This Malaysia Airlines tweet is incredible. 深圳桑拿论坛网,深圳上门按摩,/afADPORfD5 (via @MikeIsaac) pic.twitter深圳桑拿论坛会所,/q8TJ4N4HNs

— justin kanew (@justin_kanew) November 29, 2014

Malaysia Airlines said the tweet “was intended to inspire travellers during this holiday period to explore destinations and deals” it was offering.

@MAS seriously? That’s your tag line? Sheesh.

— Kchnwtch (@kchnwtch) November 27, 2014

“Unfortunately, it unintentionally caused offence to some, and we have since removed the tweet,” it said in a brief statement.


It is the second time the carrier, which has been devastated by the loss of 537 people in two air tragedies this year, has run into criticism over its advertising recently.


In September, it said it had changed the name of a ticket-sale promotion that invoked an “inappropriate” death reference by asking travellers which places were on their “Bucket List”.


Bookings have plummeted due to the two disasters.


MH370 vanished in March with 239 passengers and crew aboard when it inexplicably diverting from its Kuala Lumpur-Beijing course. It is believed to have crashed in the Indian Ocean, but no trace has been found.


MH17 went down in July — believed hit by a surface-to-air missile — in rebellion-torn eastern Ukraine, killing all 298 aboard.


The airlines said Friday its third-quarter loss widened 54 percent year-on-year in the wake of the disasters that have sent its business into a tailspin and prompted a government rescue.


The result marks the seventh straight quarterly loss for the airline, which was already struggling to stay competitive before the disasters.

Posted in 深圳桑拿论坛 | Comments Off on Malaysia Airlines apologises for ‘offensive’ tweet

Wales grind out win over Springboks

Wales ended a six-year wait for a southern hemisphere scalp when they beat South Africa 12-6 on Saturday to ease the pressure on under-fire coach Warren Gatland.


Four Leigh Halfpenny penalties were enough to get past Pat Lambie’s two in a try-less, tense match at Cardiff’s Millennium Stadium.

Under Gatland, Wales had previously only ever beaten Australia (21-18, in November 2008) from the SANZAR trio also including the Springboks and All Blacks in 27 matches since he took charge in 2007.

The victory in Cardiff was also only Wales’ second-ever over South Africa in 30 matches, the first coming in 1999, with one match drawn in 1970.

It rounded off an autumn series for Wales that featured defeats by Australia (33-28) and New Zealand (34-16) sandwiching a narrow win over Fiji (17-13).

The defeat left the Springboks, the sole team to have inflicted a loss on New Zealand this year, with a November record of two wins (England, 31-28; Italy, 22-6) and two losses, having also gone down 29-15 to Ireland.

Wales, for whom prop Gethin Jenkins was outstanding in defence, were unable to capitalise on early possession and territory and properly utilise the attacking line-out.

That, combined with a lack of creativity out wide, and some hard Springbok running opened up a slugfest as each side struggled to get a foothold in the game where defence was king.

The Springboks were dealt a blow when captain Jean de Villiers was stretchered off midway through the second half with what looked like a nasty knee injury.

And winger Cornal Hendricks was then shown a yellow card for taking out Halfpenny in the air, referee Lacey making his decision after seeing footage on the stadium’s giant screens.

Wales continued to press but failed to make the most of an attacking scrum after fullback Willie le Roux fumbled a botched drop-goal attempt by Biggar.

But South Africa ran out of steam, allowing Wales to hold on and Gatland breathe a sigh of relief.

Wales fly-half and man-of-the-match Dan Biggar said the win “means everything”.

“All the narrow defeats we’ve had, and this makes it worth it,” he told BBC. “We always seem to do it the hard way. Yes, we had doubts.

“We’ve thrown it away so many times in the past, but we got there today and this could really help us move forward. Great relief.”

Posted in 深圳桑拿论坛 | Comments Off on Wales grind out win over Springboks

Why you should rethink buying your kid a drone for Christmas

I鈥檓 dreaming of a drone Christmas.


Tiny drones tucked into stockings. Bigger drones beneath the tree. A drone for Dad, another for Junior, a third for your cool tween niece.

Anecdotal reports suggest that drones are topping Christmas lists all over. Why are holiday shoppers so excited? 1) These newer-model aircraft are meant to be far easier to fly than their predecessors. 2) They have cameras, allowing for all manner of creative (or mischievous) projects. 3) Folks just seem to be jazzed ever since we started calling these things 鈥渄rones.鈥?/p>

Rechristening a 鈥渞emote control toy helicopter鈥?a 鈥渄rone鈥?suggests that, soon after unwrapping his present on Christmas morning, your teenage son will be executing lethal missile strikes in Yemen. And indeed there鈥檚 been a vaguely menacing edge to a lot of recent drone hype. Consumer drones have lately starred in many a techno-dystopian horrorscape: French authorities freaked out when drones mysteriously appeared above nuclear power plants. A New Jersey property owner riddled a drone with bullets when it encroached on what he considered his personal airspace. Kanye West is afraid that drones might electrocute his daughter.

Despite the new, badass nomenclature, remote control aircraft have been around for decades. I suspected these new drones were still just toys with a scarier name, and that buying one made the user less a slick paramilitary operative and more a dorky model plane enthusiast. Thus my plan, as Slate鈥檚 gadgets correspondent, was simply to test out a couple of these gizmos and find out which one would make the best holiday gift.

Rechristening a 鈥渞emote control toy helicopter鈥?a 鈥渄rone鈥?suggests that, soon after unwrapping his present on Christmas morning, your teenage son will be executing lethal missile strikes in Yemen.

One of the leading consumer drone brands is DJI, and its Phantom drones are hugely popular, so I tried one of these first. When the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ Quadcopter arrived, I pulled it from its box, screwed on its propellers (as though I were assembling a very small piece of Ikea furniture), and folded open its one-page 鈥淨uick Start Guide.鈥?The steps looked straightforward. Thinking I鈥檇 run a casual, preliminary experiment鈥攎aybe send the thing 10 feet in the air and then immediately land it鈥擨 walked to a softball field around the corner from Slate鈥檚 New York office. After switching on the remote control and the drone itself, I calibrated the drone鈥檚 compass as the guide instructed. All systems go. I fired up its four propellers.

(DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ Quadcopter with FPV HD Video Camera and 3-Axis Gimbal.)

Now, before I characterize what happened next, I鈥檇 like to issue a disclaimer: I am mostly not an idiot, but sometimes it is useful鈥攊n my guise as a tech columnist鈥攚hen I act like one. Why? Because most of us act like idiots at one time or another. We are harried, and distracted, and it鈥檚 Christmas morning and our kid wants to fly her drone RIGHT NOW. So we glance at the Quick Start Guide and think, Hey, looks easy, and thusly we wade into a minor catastrophe.

Anyway, here鈥檚 what happened. The drone lifted off the ground and, despite all my efforts to control it, ascended to a height of 20 feet before veering straight into the chain-link fence at the edge of the field and wedging itself deeply therein. I had to climb up the fence to retrieve it. It was stuck good.

Perhaps a wiser person would have paused at this point. I did not. Undeterred, I again followed the steps in the Quick Start Guide鈥攃alibrating, starting the propellers, nudging the drone into the air with the joystick. The events that followed are seared into my brain like freeze frames from a car accident. The drone zoomed to a height of 50 feet or so, far above the top of that tall chain-link fence I鈥檇 been counting on to limit potential damage. The airborne monster did not respond to my frantic jiggling of the joystick, or to my plaintive cries of 鈥淐ome back!鈥?Instead it rose and rose鈥攁nd then suddenly rocketed sidewise at alarming velocity. I watched in terror as it flew across a busy street and crashed into the third story of a tall building. It tumbled to the sidewalk with a clatter of broken, scattering plastic.

Perhaps a wiser person would have paused at this point. I did not… The events that followed are seared into my brain like freeze frames from a car accident.

A very nice woman stood by the wreckage to safeguard it for me as I ran across the street to inspect the wounded drone. Its camera was sheared clean off. Its propellers had snapped. Its battery pack had flown loose and been badly dented. It was pure luck that nobody got hurt. I felt immensely guilty and unspeakably stupid. I genuinely hoped that no witnesses would report me to the cops.

鈥淭he most dangerous thing in that box is the Quick Start Guide,鈥?says Peter Sachs, a drone advocate and the founder of the Drone Law Journal. 鈥淭here should be no such thing. Your experience isn鈥檛 surprising鈥攍earning from just the Quick Start Guide is inevitably going to result in a crash.鈥?Sachs says any new drone owner should be sure to study basic aeronautics and meteorology, and should initially operate only under the tutelage of an experienced drone pilot in a designated recreational airspace. I did none of that, and, yes, shame on me. At the same time, I鈥檝e a strong hunch my desultory approach will be replicated again and again, in the days following Christmas, by excited drone newbies all over the country. People very rarely choose to study aeronautics when they can look at a Quick Start Guide. We are impatient. We do dumb stuff.

鈥淭he most dangerous thing in that box is the Quick Start Guide.鈥?/p>

Which鈥攇iven that these things weigh as much as a steam iron, soar through the skies at 30 mph, and have whirring propellers just hankering to slice through somebody鈥檚 cornea鈥攕uggests that maybe there ought to be some regulations out there to protect us from ourselves. Can you just fly a drone anywhere? Like, say, smack in the middle of a crowded city? Without any kind of permit?

When I poked around, it seemed like the rules were fuzzy. There are prohibitions on launching drones in national parks and other federal airspace. And the Federal Aviation Administration offers some sensible, long-established guidelines for model aircraft: Don鈥檛 fly them higher than 400 feet, don鈥檛 fly them within 5 miles of an airport without alerting the control tower, and so forth. Yet most cities and states still have zero regulations that specifically apply to drones. There鈥檚 no law specifying, for instance, that I can鈥檛 buzz a drone through Midtown Manhattan in the middle of rush hour.

 Sachs says any new drone owner should be sure to study basic aeronautics and meteorology, and should initially operate only under the tutelage of an experienced drone pilot in a designated recreational airspace.

Granted, the legal landscape on this stuff seems to shift by the day. On Nov. 17, the National Transportation Safety Board held that the FAA should be allowed to regulate small consumer drones just as it does jumbo passenger jets. A more recent report suggests that commercial drone operators will soon be required to have pilot鈥檚 licenses. It鈥檚 not exactly clear yet how, if at all, these new regulations might apply to amateurs.

Attorney Brendan Schulman of the unmanned aircraft systems group (there is such a thing!) at the New York law firm of Kramer Levin is representing drone advocate Sachs and several commercial drone interests鈥攊ncluding a $2.2 billion drone investment banking fund鈥攊n a legal action against the FAA. The main beef these folks have with regulation is that they feel it could limit profitable commercial uses of drones. And, to be sure, there are many cases in which talented, professional drone pilots can provide tremendous value: search-and-rescue missions for lost hikers, for instance, or aerial reconnaissance over large fires to protect the lives of firefighters.

But after my own traumatic drone crash, I鈥檓 more worried about recreational drone pilots who are acting like morons. And here, Schulman and I disagree. He thinks existing laws are sufficient to handle any dicey drone eventualities. 鈥淐onsumer devices pose hazards all the time,鈥?he tells me. 鈥淧eople are injured by flying baseballs. There are 150 fatal lawnmower accidents a year. We have personal injury laws and property damage laws to deal with this, and any injuries that result from drone use can be resolved within existing legal frameworks.鈥?If I do fly my drone in the middle of Midtown, for instance, I can be arrested for reckless endangerment鈥攁s one 34-year-old Brooklyn man was when he crashed a drone last year near Grand Central. Schulman argues that model aircraft have been around for a long time and have posed no special legal problems in the past. (Even when they鈥檝e killed someone鈥?a href=”深圳桑拿论坛网,深圳桑拿论坛,snopes深圳桑拿论坛会所,/horrors/freakish/lawnmower.asp” target=”_blank”>as happened in Shea Stadium in 1979 as part of a model airplane show during halftime of a Jets game.)

People like Schulman and Sachs鈥攚ho, not just coincidentally, are both drone hobbyists in their spare time鈥攖hink model planes are akin to bicycles. 鈥淵ou can get on a bicycle and pose a hazard to yourself and others,鈥?says Schulman, 鈥渟o it鈥檚 important to become familiar with their operation, get to know the equipment, and learn from someone. In the same way, we should understand the risks with personal drones but we shouldn鈥檛 just treat them like bombs. I don鈥檛 think they鈥檙e so dangerous that you need some kind of license.鈥?/p>

The airborne monster did not respond to my frantic jiggling of the joystick, or to my plaintive cries of 鈥淐ome back!鈥?/p>

My experience suggests otherwise. I think drones are more usefully equated with something like mopeds, which are also vehicles that can be piloted at speeds of about 25鈥?0 miles per hour. Mopeds frequently require permitting, especially if the user is under 18. Which makes a lot of sense. Drones can be dangerous. Consider, to raise just one potentially nightmarish scenario: A drone came within a few feet of a passenger jet鈥檚 wingtip near JFK airport earlier this month. Next time, it might get sucked into an engine and cause a large-scale disaster.

In general鈥攇iven their surging popularity, and the likelihood that they鈥檒l soon be in the hands of an increasing number of underqualified pilots鈥擨 think we should consider stricter legal limitations on the speed, weight, range, and airspace use of amateur drones. Right now the FAA says anything under 55 pounds, traveling below 400 feet of altitude, can be considered a model aircraft. But imagine a 55-pound object hurtling toward you from the heavens at 30 mph, operated by a sullen 12-year-old. Things we designate as 鈥渢oys鈥?shouldn鈥檛 weigh more than a few pounds and shouldn鈥檛 be capable of climbing higher than, say, 150 feet in the air. Otherwise they鈥檙e just too hard to control. Even soldiers in the U.S. military have had problems operating their government-issued, 3-foot-long, 4-pound reconnaissance drones, as this hilarious video attests.

An attempt to launch the Spider from my hand resulted in a small slice on my palm.

I attempted to fly the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ one more time, but I couldn鈥檛 coax its propellers to start. I probably broke something important during that violent crash. (By the way, the fact that DJI includes a handful of extra propellers in the box suggests it鈥檚 well aware of the potential for mishaps.) Anyway, I found I was relieved not to fly it again. I鈥檇 been chastened by it, by what it could do.

But now you鈥檙e wondering what you鈥檙e supposed to do since you already promised your kid a drone for Hanukkah. Relax, I鈥檝e got you covered. Most of the major consumer drone companies鈥攍ike the aforementioned DJI, and another firm called 3DR鈥攎ake serious drones that tend to appeal to the technically minded. But a French company called Parrot makes delightful little drones that are far less intimidating.

(Parrot AR Drone 2.)

The Parrot AR Drone 2.0 is substantial enough to provide long afternoons of fun even for parents and older kids, yet its slightly gentler speeds and foam propeller guards make it far less scary. Want something cozier still? The Parrot MiniDrone Rolling Spider is a teensy drone that can zip around your living room. Both Parrots let you use your smartphone as a remote control, and they take sharp aerial images that automatically load to your phone鈥檚 photo cache, where you can edit them like a Hollywood director using helicopter footage.

Be aware: Even the Parrots still pose some minor hazards. I administered an unintended haircut to a potted plant in the Slate office when the AR Drone鈥檚 propellers hovered too close. And an attempt to launch the Spider from my hand resulted in a small slice on my palm. For the most part, though, these are quite suitable for beginners.

(Parrot MiniDrone Rolling Spider.)

If you want to study aeronautics, lug around a boxy remote, and launch your aircraft into the heavens, get yourself the DJI. It will provide great fun for adults or mature teens willing to put in the necessary prep time and behave responsibly. If, on the other hand, you and your kid want to mess around with a really cool toy, straight out of the box, in the confines of your backyard, get the Parrots.

Or maybe don鈥檛 buy a flying drone at all. Have you considered a nice, gravity-bound remote control vehicle?

 漏 2014, Slate 

Posted in 深圳桑拿论坛 | Comments Off on Why you should rethink buying your kid a drone for Christmas

Greenhouse airline levy urged

The report by the Australia Institute said airlines were a threat to climate because of the increasing amounts of greenhouse gas pollution generated by a growing travel market, Fairfax newspapers reported.


The industry is growing so quickly it could account for half Australia's total emissions by 2050, said the report's authors, Andrew Macintosh and Christian Dowie.

Aircraft gases excluded

But because non-carbon dioxide greenhouse gases and greenhouse gases generated by international travel are not included in the greenhouse gas inventory, airline pollution could wipe out the effects of cuts in emissions in other sectors, they said.

"We are going to have to fly a hell of a lot less and it is going to cost us more," Mr Macintosh said.

A task force of business leaders, including outgoing Qantas chairman Margaret Jackson, is expected to deliver recommendations on a trading system to the government next week.

But it is expected to exclude aviation from any pollution penalties.

Scale of problem

Mr Macintosh welcomed recent measures to cut aviation emissions such as improved fuel efficiency and air traffic control sequencing but said the government failed to understand the scale of the problem.

"In terms of where we need to go, the government hasn't done anything like near what needs to be done," he said.

In Australia, domestic and international air travel is expected to grow at 4.6 and 5.1 per cent respectively a year between 2005 and 2020, ensuring a doubling of passenger numbers in 15 years.

The authors calculated airlines currently contributed between three and five per cent of total emissions.

However, if they were allowed to continue polluting without penalty and Australia adopted a target of cutting emissions to 60 per cent below 2000 levels by 2050, airlines could account for as much as 51 per cent of the total allowance.

"Irrespective of which policy instruments are implemented to curtail aviation emissions, Australians cannot expect to fly more than they currently do today," the report said.

Posted in 深圳桑拿论坛 | Comments Off on Greenhouse airline levy urged

Howard: 'Not playing politics'

Mr Howard ruled out retiring before the election and says he has no regrets about his decision to contest a fifth term.


But his words appeared to fall on deaf ears, with two former ministers publicly squabbling on the floor of parliament after question time today.

West Australian Liberals Judi Moylan and Wilson Tuckey ignored Mr Howard's pleas for unity on the difficult issue of AWB, with Ms Moylan accusing Mr Tuckey of defamation and Mr Tuckey sticking by his claim that she was defending corrupt behaviour by the wheat exporter.

Tuckey on the loose

It was Mr Tuckey's second offence of the day, after the outspoken backbencher earlier hinted that the Liberal party could dump Mr Howard before the election.

"Some people say you can't do things late, well Labor couldn't have done it any later than they did with Bob Hawke," Mr Tuckey told reporters.

"History tells us he not only won, he stayed there for a long time."

But Mr Howard ruled out handing over to heir apparent Treasurer Peter Costello before the election, expected to be held in October or November.

"I have no desire to do anything other than remain prime minister of my country and leader of my party for as long as the Australian people want that to be the case," Mr Howard told Sky News.

"Like any other leader of a democratic party in a democracy, I am at the disposal of the Australian people – whatever they decide will be right."

Mr Howard denied his warning to the party room was an attempt to play politics or send a signal that he was willing to hand over power to Mr Costello in the next term of government.

"I see no point in deluding myself or deluding my colleagues or giving a signal to the Australian people that I don't understand that they are at the moment contemplating a change of government," Mr Howard said.

Beazley's view

Former Labor leader Kim Beazley, whose ousting by new leader Kevin Rudd last December started the government's slide in the polls, said Mr Costello had missed his chance by not challenging for the leadership last year.

"He should have challenged, lost, spent five or six months recreating himself with speeches on the environment, on Iraq, on industrial relations," Mr Beazley told ABC radio.

"The party would be begging him now and he would have come in as a cleanskin.

"Frankly, simply changing John Howard now for Peter Costello is shifting deckchairs on the Titanic."

Mr Rudd played down Labor's chances, saying the party would have to defy history to regain office.

"If you're any student of Australian politics you'll know that on two occasions since the last world war, Labor has won government from opposition," he told reporters.

"We need to win 16 seats on this occasion. History's against us."

Posted in 深圳桑拿论坛 | Comments Off on Howard: 'Not playing politics'

Iraq kickbacks under scrutiny

That same committee questioned the Wheat Export Authority's independence from disgraced exporter AWB.


Australian Federal Police (AFP) commissioner Mick Keelty gave no indication as to when Iraq kickback charges, if any, could be laid.

"The task force has completed its scoping phase and moved into its initial investigation phase. A senior coordination group has been established which is consistent with Commissioner Cole's recommendation," he said.

"The task force is independent and communicates to government through a senior coordination group chaired by the secretary of the Attorney General's department."

The long-awaited report into the $290 million in bribes paid by AWB to the former Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq was released on November 27 last year.

Commissioner Terence Cole recommended 11 former AWB executives and an oil businessman face possible criminal charges for allegedly deceiving the United Nations and Australian government over the scandal.

AWB influence

The Wheat Export Authority has denied it is being influenced by a group of farm lobbyists who are working together to create a new single desk for wheat marketing.

A Senate estimates committee has heard Labor senator Kerry O'Brien suggest the group, which consists of the Victorian Farmers Federation, AgForce, Western Australian Farmers Federation and NSW Farmers Association, is little more than a front for disgraced exporter AWB.

"Has the authority undertaken any investigation to determine the veracity of claims that a new alliance of state based grain groups … is actually organised by and a front for the AWB Limited?" Senator O'Brien asked.

"In other words AWB Limited is playing a manipulative role in the grain grower representation market."

Authority acting CEO Peter Woods refused to comment on whether the group was a front for AWB.

"It's not something we would need to comment on," Mr Woods told the committee.

Prime Minister John Howard yesterday announced long-awaited changes to the way Australia exports wheat to the rest of the world.

The changes were sparked by the Cole commission of inquiry into $300 million in kickbacks paid by AWB to the regime of deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

Mr Howard has given farmers a March 1, 2008 deadline to reach agreement on the nature of a new wheat export body based around a single desk.

Posted in 深圳桑拿论坛 | Comments Off on Iraq kickbacks under scrutiny

Downer backs missile shield

But he said it was unlikely "in the foreseeable future" Australian cities would be protected by the system.


VIDEO: Downer in the US

Japan's Nikkei business daily newspaper reported this week that Australia, Japan and the US had agreed at a meeting in Tokyo last month on a joint research framework for a system.

Mr Downer, speaking today in California alongside US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, said Australia supported the concept of the missile defence system.

He noted North Korea was developing long range missiles.

Asked if it was realistic Australia would have missiles guarding its cities in the near future, Mr Downer replied he did not "think that's likely any time in the foreseeable future".

"We do support the concept of missile defence and we do work with our friends and allies on that issue," he said.

The pair answered questions from the media and invited guests at an event at LA's Ronald Reagan Presidential Library.

"We have never made a secret of that."

Mr Downer said in years to come if there was a threat, Australia could deploy a missile defence system to protect itself.

"We are not likely to deploy such a system in Australia in the imaginable future, but I suppose way off who knows what strategic circumstances there could be," he said.

"There are not the strategic circumstances where we feel we would need it ourselves at this stage."

"Others, including the US, their need for it, is entirely understandable, and we are happy to work with them," he said.

"You have countries like North Korea developing long range missiles … and where you have other countries doing research and developing ballistic missile systems."

"I say, well sometimes they object to missile defence, but there is no need for missile defence if nobody has missiles that could be threatening."

Posted in 深圳桑拿论坛 | Comments Off on Downer backs missile shield

'Howard on par with Mugabe'

Amnesty International has slammed Australia's treatment of asylum seekers in a report comparing John Howard to Robert Mugabe in his use of "fear politics".


Australia's refugee exchange deal with the US is a panicked response to failed policies of offshore processing, Amnesty International says.

Canberra and Washington have agreed to a deal under which asylum seekers detained on Nauru can be sent to the US once their claims are approved, while US-bound Haitian refugees detained in Guantanamo Bay can be resettled in Australia.

Amnesty's director Irene Khan says the agreement was a bid to save face because both governments realised their hardline stance on refugees was a sham.

"This is a desperate measure by two governments to cover up the fact that their offshore processing policy on refugees has basically failed," she told ABC radio.

"So what they're doing is sending people from Nauru to the US and people from Cuba – the Haitians from Cuba – to Australia so that they do not have to face the shame of having to release these people into their own countries.

"It's a cover-up, it's not a solution and it creates … huge impact on the individuals themselves."

The Howard government had an "appalling" domestic human rights record over its treatment of asylum seekers and indigenous people which had undermined its good work overseas, she said.

Ms Khan said she was pleased confessed terrorism supporter David Hicks was back in Australia, but he never received a fair trial in Guantanamo Bay.

"The Military Commissions Act does not provide for fair trial because it allows evidence obtained under torture, it does not provide for proper legal representation, there is no separation from the administration," she said.

"He had an unfair trial, in our view, and he had to wait five years for it."

Hicks was only returned because his case was becoming an embarrassment for the Australian government, she said.

Ms Khan urged Australian voters to think about giving others a "fair go" at this year's election.

In the forward to Amnesty International's annual report published yesterday, Ms Khan said the fear generated by leaders such as Mr Howard "thrives on myopic and cowardly leadership".

Ms Khan included Mr Howard with Mr Mugabe, US President George W

Bush and Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir in the same scathing paragraph.

"The Howard government portrayed desperate asylum-seekers in leaky boats as a threat to Australia's national security and raised a false alarm of a refugee invasion," Ms Khan wrote.

Posted in 深圳桑拿论坛 | Comments Off on 'Howard on par with Mugabe'

NT camps reject funding

Aboriginal communities in Alice Springs' town camp have rejected, for the final time, an offer to hand control of their housing to the Northern Territory government in return for $60 million in commonwealth funds.


Federal Indigenous Affairs Minister Mal Brough, who spearheaded the plan, said he was deeply "hurt" by the rejection.

"I am deeply disturbed and hurt," he told reporters.

"You have no idea how difficult this is when you have witnessed the things that I have and the stories that I know about and the fact that only a matter of a couple of weeks ago another woman was brutally murdered in these places."

Later, he told ABC radio he was in despair.

"I'm in despair. I would have thought people would have been champing at the bit."

The rejection was the second in less than a week and comes after 14 months of protracted negotiations.

Under the original proposal, the 18 housing associations which oversee the camps could retain control of the land if it was unconditionally sub-leased to the NT government for 99 years.

The camps are notorious for high levels of serious crime and are home to rampant substance abuse.

The town camps come together under the banner of Tangentyere Council and lawyers for the council, in a letter to Mr Brough, said there were many concerns with the deal.

"There has been no proper process of negotiation and Tangentyere has not had the opportunity to obtain proper professional advice," the letter said.

Tangentyere said the deal would leave the 18 camp associations with "no legally enforceable rights or entitlements in relation to any aspect of the future land use, management and development of the camps".

Opposition indigenous affairs spokeswoman Jenny Macklin said she was disappointed by the outcome.

"I am really disappointed that the parties couldn't reach an agreement on funding for the Alice Springs town camp upgrades," Ms Macklin said.

"That money is desperately needed to make sure people living in the town camps have safe housing and basic services.

"Tangentyere Council, Mal Brough and the territory government should take responsibility to make sure that such a disadvantaged group of people don't miss out on basic services that other Australians expect."

Mr Brough said the $60 million would now go to another needy community.

"The $60 million is off the table."

He suggested the money may go to the West Australian community Halls Creek which has already received more than $100 million in assistance.

"I said to (WA Indigenous Affairs Minister Michelle Roberts) in the event that I have seriously additional money, will you have the potential to go back to your cabinet and get more resources for better reforms and better outcomes.

"She indicated both publicly and privately there that she could, so there is numerous communities in Western Australia that can benefit and I hope that they will."

Posted in 深圳桑拿论坛 | Comments Off on NT camps reject funding

Abbott heckled over report

The 1997 report into the separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families accused governments of genocide and called for an apology and compensation.


Members of the audience disrupted the health minister's speech at Parliament House in Canberra today, calling for the government to say sorry.

Mr Abbott continued with his speech amid heckling and audible groans from the audience.

He later told reporters that although he did not like being heckled he was pleased to have attended the function.

"No-one likes being heckled and I thought that both Mal (Brough) and I were treating the occasion with a lot of seriousness and with a lot of respect," Mr Abbott said.

"We entered into the spirit of the day and I'm a little disappointed that not everyone agreed but never the less I'm pleased to have been there."

Mr Abbott said while he could understand why Lowitja O'Donoghue wanted a government apology, the debate had moved on.

"The important thing for reconciliation is what happens in the hearts of individual people," he said.

"A lot of very good things have happened over the last generation and I would rather dwell on the good that's been done rather than engage in something that which is more likely to be debated.

"Someone like Lowitja might want to give the government a little wrap over the knuckles because sure there's always more that you can do.

"I'd rather focus on the good things that are happening and the good that has been done than go over old ground."

The government has announced 22 more staff will be employed for services to help members of the stolen generation find their families.

Posted in 深圳桑拿论坛 | Comments Off on Abbott heckled over report

Rudd denies company unfairness

Opposition Leader Kevin Rudd has said his wife's company had made an honest mistake, which she had sought to rectify.


Mr Rudd admitted the company had indeed underpaid some workers, but it had taken remedial action when this was discovered.

The company itself has issued a statement denying allegations that it had acted unfairly to its workers.

WorkDirections Australia Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of Therese Rein's company, Ingeus, denied it had stripped workers of significant award conditions.

It took over the Frankston-based company Your Employment Solutions (YES) last year and took over its workers.

WorkDirections today issued a written statement saying its pay arrangements with employees were "certainly not unlawful", and had not been designed to remove penalty rates, overtime or allowances.

"The common law agreements offered to YES employees when WorkDirections acquired the business 10 months ago, were for employment on no less favourable terms than they were previously on," the statement read.

"The arrangement offered to transferring employees involved the payment of an aggregated wage rate with an above award component calculated to fairly compensate employees for their full award entitlements.

"Such an arrangement is not uncommon in private sector

employment and certainly not unlawful."

The statement said the company also took steps to comply with a pay increase in line with the award in 2006, and that it was during this process that it was discovered that some staff had been underpaid because "their duties had not previously been classified correctly in accordance with the award".

The statement said WorkDirections Australia immediately ordered an external independent review to determine which staff members had been affected.

"All those employees still working for the company were recompensed in full for under-payments by 20 April 2007," the statement read.

"The company had already taken steps to locate those who had left the company's employ and will recompense them in full shortly."

WorkDirections Australia said it would review its common law agreements with employees to ensure they comply with relevant industrial laws.

Posted in 深圳桑拿论坛 | Comments Off on Rudd denies company unfairness

Qantas shares soar on new plan

In its first briefing for analysts since the Airline Partners Australia (APA) $11.


1 billion takeover bid collapsed, the airline reiterated it was reviewing its capital management strategies.

It expanded on the options, indicating shareholders could benefit from a spin-off of assets, a share buyback or an increase to dividend payouts.

Key to any demerger would be an expanded freight business that could be spun into a separate company, according to analysts who attended the briefing.

Those attending the behind-closed-doors event heard Qantas was considering extensive capital expenditure to expand its air and land freight operations locally and within Asian markets.

Shaw Stockbroking aviation analyst Brent Mitchell said any demerger was more likely to involve the freight operations than a spin-off and separate listing of Qantas's successful low cost airline Jetstar.

"Freight could be the one they spin off in a demerger," he said.

"In terms of freight options going forward, you're already seeing joint ventures with Australia Post and the options will only increase, especially if they move beyond air freight."

While Qantas didn't announce any specific detail about its capital management plans, it did commit to completing its review within six months.

There has been widespread talk in financial markets in recent weeks about a possible capital return to shareholders, given the health of the Qantas balance sheet.

Merrill Lynch analysts said last week Qantas was capable of returning $2.2 billion to shareholders without stressing interest cover ratios.

Mr Mitchell said a return of that magnitude was possible, but unlikely.

"They could return $2 billion, it's a question of whether they will or not and I suspect it wouldn't be to that level, it's more likely to be about $1 billion," he said.

It was unlikely Qantas would sell its catering business or Frequent Flyer Program, Mr Mitchell said, although the points system for the program could be restructured through another company to give it greater financial flexibility.

During its presentation Qantas reiterated plans to expand Jetstar further into Asia and aggressively target holiday leisure routes.

Both Qantas and Jetstar would also reconsider routes that had had abandoned or neglected, particularly to South America and Europe.

Qantas maintained current profit forecasts and said there was no need for an earnings upgrade.

The market welcomed the capital management, sending Qantas shares up to a new record intraday high of $5.54, well above the APA offer price of $5.45 a share.

The stock then closed at a new record of $5.46, up four cents, as turnover spiked to about 53 million shares making Qantas the second most traded stock by volume on the exchange.

The resilient share price stands in contrast with predictions made by both outgoing Qantas chairman Margaret Jackson and the APA consortium that share price would collapse with the bid's failure.

Posted in 深圳桑拿论坛 | Comments Off on Qantas shares soar on new plan

PM rejects Amnesty’s judgement

The human rights pressure group has accused Mr Howard of portraying asylum-seekers as a threat to national security and of sponsoring policies as divisive as Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe's regime.


In a report released on Wednesday, it also criticised Australia's role in the war on terror and its treatment of female victims of violence.

Amnesty secretary-general Irene Khan said the fear generated by leaders such as Mr Howard "thrives on myopic and cowardly leadership".

Ms Khan lumped Mr Howard in with Mr Mugabe, US President George W Bush and Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir in a paragraph about leaders who used fear to suit their political agenda.


In statement today, Mr Howard rejected the way Australia was characterised in the Amnesty report.

"The report's entry on Australia contains a string of assertions, unsupported by evidence and devoid of context," he said.

"The report's treatment of Australia amounts to little more than a shoddy caricature.

"Nowhere is the report's political agenda clearer than the paragraph in its foreword which seeks to bracket Australian and US policies with the horrendous human rights situation in Darfur and Robert Mugabe's disastrous misrule in Zimbabwe."

Ms Khan stood by her comments today, accusing the Howard government of having an "appalling" domestic human rights record regarding its treatment of asylum seekers and indigenous people.

These failures had undermined its good work overseas, she told ABC Radio.

Mr Howard said he respected Amnesty, but its current leadership had lost sight of the need for balance or rigour.

"I believe many Australians will be as offended by this report as I am," he said.

"My government makes no apology for taking appropriate, balanced steps to protect the Australian public from the very real threat of terrorism and to protect our borders."

Posted in 深圳桑拿论坛 | Comments Off on PM rejects Amnesty’s judgement

Swedish Greys - a WordPress theme from Nordic Themepark.